| 
       
 
 |  | Note to the Reader
    Short Course on Quantitative Neuroanatomy
 Organizers: John H. Morrison and Patrick R. Hof
 Society for Neuroscience Education Committee
 Saturday, November 7, 1998 (2:30-3:00 pm)
 Westin Bonaventure Hotel and Suites, Los Angeles, CA
 
  
 Print FriendlyProtocol Details
 Neuroscience Meets Quantitative Genetics: Using Morphometric Data to Map 
      Genes that Modulate CNS Architecture
 
 Robert W. Williams, Lu Lu, and 
      Richelle C. Strom
 Center for Neuroscience, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, 
      University of Tennessee, Memphis Tennessee 38163
 Email questions and comments to rwilliam@nb.utmem.edu
   
 
 
 PCR protocolThe methods detailed below can be used to detect differences of 4 bp or 
      more in the length of PCR reaction products between 90 and 160 bp. 
 We amplify 50 ng of genomic DNA per reaction. Amplifying more DNA than 
      this may result in overloaded lanes. Each individual 10 �l PCR reaction 
      mixture contains the following:
 
 
 
        1 �l of genomic DNA at a concentration of 50 ng/�l 2 �l of microsatellite primer stock solution (20 �l of both front 
        and back primers from Research Genetics Inc. are combined and diluted in 
        160 �l of distilled water to make our primer stock solution) 7 �l of the PCR mix listed below  The third item above, the PCR mix, is usually made in large quantity and 
      frozen until use (1.4 ml of reaction mix in a 1.5 ml polypropelene 
      microcentrifuge tube is enough to run 2 x 96 reaction products). Multiply 
      the volumes listed below by 100 for each set of 96 reactions. PCR mix 
      consists of:
 
 
 
        1.0 �l of 10X PCR buffer 0.8 �l of 25 mM MgCl2 0.1 �l of 80 mM dNTPs (20 mM each) 1.83 �l of 60% Ficoll (Type 400DL; Sigma F1418) in 1 mM cresol red
        3.22 �l of filtered (0.45 �m) distilled water 0.05 �l of Taq at a concentration of 5 units/�l  We have been using MJ Research polypropylene V-bottom 96-well microplates 
      sealed with a PCR plate sealer film (Cycleseal Cat# 1044-39-4 Robbins 
      Scientific, 814 San Aleso Ave Sunnyvale CA 94086, (408) 734-8500). In our 
      hands this plate sealer works better than MJR sealer.
 
 DNA is amplified using a touchdown PCR protocol with the following cycling 
      parameters:
 
 
 
        94 deg for 3 min (melts duplex genomic DNA) 60 deg for 1 min (highest stringency annealing of primers) 72 deg for 1 min (extension of Taq across the target microsatellite)
        94 deg for 30 sec 58 deg for 1 min (-2 deg stringency) 72 deg for 1 min 94 deg for 30 sec 56 deg for 1 min (-4 deg stringency) 72 deg for 1 min 94 deg for 30 sec 54 deg for 1 min (-6 deg stringency) 72 deg for 1 min 94 deg for 30 sec 52 deg for 1 min (-8 deg stringency) 72 deg for 1 min 94 deg for 30 sec 50 deg for 1 min (-10 deg = baseline stringency) 72 deg for 1 min Repeat Steps 16 through 18, a total of 30 times for a total of 35 
        cycles. Hold product at 8 deg in the machine and at 4 deg in the 
        refrigerator until electrophoresis. This thermal cycler program run 
        takes just under 2 hours to run on MJR PTC-100 or PTC-200.  
 The gel is made of 2.5�3.0% MetaPhor agarose (FMC Corp, 
      
      http://www.bioproducts.com) mixed in 1X TBE buffer. Ethidium 
      bromide at a concentration of 0.5 �g/ml is added to fresh gel before 
      polymerization (typically 300 ml of buffer; 9 gm of MetaPhor agarose, 15 
      �l of 10 mg/ml EtBr). We cast gels for use with the Bio-Rad Subcell Model 
      192 electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad, 1-800-424-6723). These gels are large 
      and relatively thin (gel dimensions are 25.5-cm-tall, 24.5-cm-wide and 3- 
      to 4-mm-thick). Gels are cast with a total of 204 wells arranged in four 
      rows of 51 wells. Only 48 wells per row are typically used. Each well is 
      small (0.75 mm front-to-back, 3 mm right-to-left, and 2.5 mm deep). 
      Adjacent wells are separated by 4.5 mm�two times the distance between the 
      tips of the 12-channel multipipetter.  All of the PCR reaction product (now usually about 8.5 �l) is loaded 
      into a well using a 12-channel pipette (Eppendorf or equivalent) and 
      0.1�10 �l tips (Fisher Redi-Tip, Cat # 21-278-2). PCR products in the 
      eight rows of the 96-well plate are interleaved across rows of the gel: 
      Row A to odd lanes 1 to 23; row B to even lanes 2 to 24, row C to odd 
      lanes 25 to 47, row D to even lanes 26 to 48, etc. Gels are run at 170 volts�equal to about 6.7 V/cm. Under these 
      conditions the PCR products are usually well separated after 80 minutes. 
      Note that the voltage gradient can be raised as high as 16 volt/cm to 
      shorten time and improve band resolution. The gels are loaded at a 
      temperature of 15 degrees while immersed in 1X Tris/Boric acid/EDTA 
      buffer. We circulate the gel buffers through a cooling bath (Fisher 
      Isotemp refrigeration unit 1016S with a Bio-Rad variable speed fluid pump) 
      to maintain gel temperature at 18 to 20 deg. After the run is complete, 
      gels are moved onto a large UV illuminator and cut apart into managable-sized 
      pieces that can be photographed using a simple Polaroid system.  For PCR we use a set of 4 PTC-100 and PTC-200 cyclers with hot-top 
      96-well blocks Problems: If the intensity of the PCR product is too low to photograph 
      well, then try these simple modifications: 1. Increase the percentage of 
      ethidium bromide in the gel two--fold (see paragraph above). 2. Another 
      tactic is to simply run the entire PCR cycle again (another 35 cycles) 
      without addition of any reagents. A more mind alternive is just to add 10 
      to 14 cycles.
 
   
 Economizing: MetaPhor agarose is expensive ($2 per gram). We 
      typically recycle all parts of gels that do not contain abundant amounts 
      of PCR product. Large slabs are remelted and used again and again. In each 
      cycle of recycling we typically add 2 �l of a 10 mg/ml solution of EtBr.
       Photography is also expensive. An entire gel with 192 lanes can be 
      photographed using just two exposures. The gel is first cut vertically 
      down the middle. Then the important parts are sliced out and arranged 
      close to each other in four rows (11 cm wide and 15 cm high) on a UV 
      transilluminator (Fisher FBTIV-614). We use an Eicker brain knife to slice 
      gels. The gel left-overs are put in a 1000 ml beaker for eventual 
      recycling. A small Fotodyne hood (Cat 5-5342) is used with a hand-held 
      Polaroid instant camera. Exposures are 0.5 sec at F8. Film is Polaroid 
      Polapan 667 (3.25 by 4.25 inch).  We have designed Excel and FileMaker files that allow rapid entry of 
      genotype data using a numeric keypad (8 = high band homozygote, 2 = low 
      band homozygote, 5 = heterozygote). Trouble-shooting: If amplification of PCR product is not uniform 
      or the apparent concentration of the product on the gel is too low, assess 
      the following factors:  
        Make sure that the concentration of DNAs used in the reaction is 
        relatively uniform. This will involve diluting each sample individually 
        (our target concentration is 50 to 100 ng/per microliter). Preparing the MetaPhor gel can be critical. Make sure that the 
        MetaPhor is dissolved completely: no bubbles or blocks of half-melted 
        Metaphor. First dissolve in cold buffer and warm slowly with a stir bar, 
        and after the Metaphor has dissolved completely put into microwave oven 
        (high power: 1 min, wait 30 sec: 1 min then wait 30 sec, 1 min + 30 sec, 
        30 sec, 30 sec, 30 sec, 10 sec, etc. Times depend on volume). Be careful 
        that the Metaphor does not boil over. Make sure the DNAs used in the PCR reactions are completely mixed 
        before you pipette them into the PCR mix. Vortex and also mechanically 
        stir with the pipette tip. Try doubling the concentration of Taq in the reaction.  Our thanks to Drs. Xiyun Peng, Guomin Zhou, Jing Gu, and Lu Lu for 
      improving the efficiency and reliability of these methods.    
        Laird PW, Zijderbeld A, Linders K, Rudnicki MA, Jaenisch R, Berns A 
        (1991) Simplified mammalian DNA isolation procedure. Nucleic Acid Res 
        19:4293. 
White HW, Kurukawa N (1997) Agarose-based system for separation of 
        short tandem repeat loci. BioTechniques 22:976�979. 
        
        A great web site for trouble-shooting PCR reactions    
   Fig. 2.   Genotypes at a microsatellite locus on chromosome 5 
      (D5Mit294). The left lane is a DNA size standard, and the next two 
      lanes are PCR samples from the parental strains B (higher band at 
      198 bp) and D (lowest band at 176 bp). Lanes 4 to 25 are the F2 
      samples. The bottom band�or bands, in the case of heterozygotes�define the 
      genotype of each animal. The bands at the top of the figure are caused by 
      DNA retained in the pipetting wells. Figure from work by G. Zhou (Zhou & 
      Williams, 1997).
 
 Questions and Answers 1. Is there any particular reason to use Ficoll rather than sucrose in 
      the PCR? ANSWER: No. We initially used sucrose, but Ficoll works 
      slightly better. (I think that it may be a bit heavier than 60% sucrose, 
      but would need to verify this.)  2. Does cresol red run with the DNA of a particular size in a 3% 
      metaphor gel? (or maybe it runs the wrong way). ANSWER: The cresol 
      red will run close to the primer dimer (less than 75 bp).  3. What Tq do you use? ANSWER: We use Promega Taq. We use the 
      cheaper grade.  4. Metaphor agarose is very expensive. Do you reuse it? And if not, why 
      not? ANSWER: Yes, we reuse the MetaPhor 3 to 7 times (see notes 
      above on "Economizing").  5. Do you have any sense of how much resolution is lost if the gel is 
      run at room temp at half the speed you use? ANSWER: When we run the 
      gels cold and at high voltage as described above, we can consistently 
      resolve 6 bp, sometimes 4 bp, and rarely 2 bp. If the gel runs hot, then 
      bands will often be bowed and distorted and have a lower intensity. The 
      quality of bands depends to a great extent on the particular primer pair. 
      With a good primer pair you certainly could run at room temperature or 
      higher at a lower voltage.  6. Do you know of any reasons why the method would not be useful for 
      multiplex PCR? ANSWER: We have multiplexed using the same protocol. 
      You will need to test and optimize primer sets and you will probably need 
      a base-pair gap of 10 bp. This usually involves changeing relative primer 
      concentrations, with higher concentrations used for those primers that 
      amplify the larger product.  7. Can I cast the Metaphor slab and leave it out overnight? Yes, but 
      refrigerate the slab overnight at 4 degrees.  8. What is the cost per genotype as described in this protocol? DNA extraction is a fixed one-time cost. To extract enough DNA for 
      1000 reactions or more using the protocol listed above is about $0.40/case 
      (DNA from spleen). Our costs are as follows per single reaction of 10 micro;l:
       
        Cost for Taq: $0.06 Cost of PCR primers from Res Gen: $0.02 Cost of dNTP: $0.02 Cost of gel (includes ecomony achieved by recycling): $0.05 Cost of Polaroid photo (film cost divided by 96 lanes): $0.01 Cost of plastic ware: $0.07  Total genotype cost is therefore $0.23 + DNA preparation/number of 
      genotypes per case.  Labor expense: We assume that one full time technician can carry out 
      approximately 6 x 96 well plates per day. This includes all data entry. To 
      achieve this thoughput does require a 96-channel Robinson pipette station. 
      Therefore to compute total expense you will need to divide the technician 
      salary by 576. Assume total technical cost of 33K/year (including fringe 
      etc, assume 48 weeks per year and 5/days per week) = $140/day. This equals 
      about $0.25 per genotype per day.  The cost of personnel and supplies is therefore approximately matched 
      using our methods.  Ways to economize further. 1. Make Taq; 2. Use even cheaper DNA 
      extraction method.  For a current evaluation of genotyping methods see: Weber JL, Broman KW 
      (2000) Genotyping for human whole-genome scans: past, present, and future. 
      Adv in Genet 42:7796. 
 
 Since 15 Oct 1998 Revised 21 Jan 2001
 
 |  |  |